Sunday, October 28, 2012

Update


Action Research Plan

Increasing teacher happiness and staff camaraderie thus leading to more relevant and rigorous lessons from teachers

             At my school we have had higher teacher turn-over rate than one would expect.  Over the last three years our turnover  rate has been between 25 to 30 percent.  Other schools in my district as well as comparable schools surrounding our area have had a significantly lower turnover rate in the same amount of time.  Our human resources department has reported to our campus administration that many of our exit surveys have reported that teachers left due to current working conditions.  After choosing this as my action research project, I conducted an anonymous electronic survey with current staff members to identify specific needs in regards to current working conditions and school climate.   Through the surveys, teachers expressed concerns with not having common planning periods, meetings such as ARDs and testing procedures being planned during a teacher’s conference, inconsistent discipline from assistant principals,  low staff camaraderie, and lack of positive feedback to faculty members.  After reviewing the survey results the vision for my action research project includes working with the master schedule and the administrative team to ensure as many core subject teachers as possible have common planning periods; ensuring teacher’s conferences are not being taken with meetings and that we are in compliance with laws regarding teacher planning periods; meeting with the principal about teachers’ concerns of discipline in hopes of her meeting with assistant principals in regards to following all discipline referrals in a consistent manner; and developing organizations at school for boosting teacher morale as well as an organization that promotes school spirit.  “Administrator support is essential, not only in allowing time to initiate an inquiry, but also in developing in teachers necessary inquiry skills to pinpoint the issue to address” (Ringler, 2007, p.28).  The building principal , assistant principals, campus faculty who participated in survey, and the SBDM committee were involved in the decision making process.  The principal gave permission to me to conduct this project and the survey based upon the information given from HR.  Once the survey was completed by the faculty, I reviewed the results and my vision with the building principal.  My principal provided feedback and suggestions for my project and gave final approval for the actions of the project.  I presented the data collected from the needs assessment and survey to our campus administration, SBDM committee, and faculty.  I presented my plan of action and laid out the action steps with a timeline in accordance with my vision.  I also asked faculty members to volunteer for our new committees and organizations that are going to be formed to improve staff climate.   Once organizations were created, the committees elected a chairperson to organize and run meetings as well as treasurer to handle all monies collected.  Student achievement will be increased by teachers having common planning periods to create more effective lessons and share lesson delivery strategies.  Also, with the teachers being happy about staff climate, their performance will be better in the classroom.  Teachers will want to show up at work which will increase teacher attendance.  All students whether exceptionally gifted or having special needs will benefit from happy teachers.

 

Ringler, Marjorie C. EdD. (2007).  AASA Journal of Scholarship and Practice: Action  
         Research an Effective Instructional Leadership Skill for Future Public School Leaders. 
         Vol. 4, no. 1. 27-37.